[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110709205308.GC17463@localhost>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:53:08 -0700
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@...hang.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/readahead: Move the check for ra_pages after
VM_SequentialReadHint()
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 03:41:20AM +0800, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
> page_cache_sync_readahead checks for ra->ra_pages again, so moving the check after VM_SequentialReadHint.
NAK. This patch adds nothing but overheads.
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
> if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
> return;
> - if (!ra->ra_pages)
> - return;
>
> if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)) {
> page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset,
> @@ -1575,6 +1573,9 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!ra->ra_pages)
> + return;
> +
page_cache_sync_readahead() has the same
if (!ra->ra_pages)
return;
So the patch adds the call into page_cache_sync_readahead() just to return..
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists