linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] Core device subsystem implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110709053818.GA14519@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2011 22:38:18 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] Core device subsystem implementation

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> There is a small number of devices that the core kernel needs very
> early in the boot process, namely an interrupt controller and a timer,
> long before the device model is up and running.
> 
> The "core device subsystem" offers a class based device/driver
> matching model, doesn't rely on any other subsystem, is very (too?)
> simple, and support getting information both from DT as well as from
> static data provided by the platform. It also gives the opportunity to
> define the probing order by offering a sorting hook at runtime.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---

Any reason why you didn't use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to at least
figure out who to send something like this to for review?

Please do so in the future, otherwise it will get overlooked...

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/