[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110708225118.932348601@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:49:50 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: [01/35] ksm: fix NULL pointer dereference in scan_get_next_rmap_item()
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
commit 2b472611a32a72f4a118c069c2d62a1a3f087afd upstream.
Andrea Righi reported a case where an exiting task can race against
ksmd::scan_get_next_rmap_item (http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/1/742) easily
triggering a NULL pointer dereference in ksmd.
ksm_scan.mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head with only one registered mm
CPU 1 (__ksm_exit) CPU 2 (scan_get_next_rmap_item)
list_empty() is false
lock slot == &ksm_mm_head
list_del(slot->mm_list)
(list now empty)
unlock
lock
slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next)
(list is empty, so slot is still ksm_mm_head)
unlock
slot->mm == NULL ... Oops
Close this race by revalidating that the new slot is not simply the list
head again.
Andrea's test case:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#define BUFSIZE getpagesize()
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
void *ptr;
if (posix_memalign(&ptr, getpagesize(), BUFSIZE) < 0) {
perror("posix_memalign");
exit(1);
}
if (madvise(ptr, BUFSIZE, MADV_MERGEABLE) < 0) {
perror("madvise");
exit(1);
}
*(char *)NULL = 0;
return 0;
}
Reported-by: Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
mm/ksm.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1215,6 +1215,12 @@ static struct rmap_item *scan_get_next_r
slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
ksm_scan.mm_slot = slot;
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
+ /*
+ * Although we tested list_empty() above, a racing __ksm_exit
+ * of the last mm on the list may have removed it since then.
+ */
+ if (slot == &ksm_mm_head)
+ return NULL;
next_mm:
ksm_scan.address = 0;
ksm_scan.rmap_item = list_entry(&slot->rmap_list,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists