linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #36952] [2.6.39] CIFS write failures where 2.6.38 works

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110710143458.531f226d@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:34:58 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
	Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...t.no>
Subject: Re: [Bug #36952] [2.6.39] CIFS write failures where 2.6.38 works

On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:58:54 +0300
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36952
> > Subject         : [2.6.39] CIFS write failures where 2.6.38 works
> > Submitter       : Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...t.no>
> > Date            : 2011-06-01 10:11 (40 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <4DE6103E.6010100@...t.no>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130692387613423&w=2
> 
> The last comment in Bugzilla states that Jeff was working on a patch.
> Was it ever submitted to mainline and stable?
> 
>                                 Pekka

Yes, see commit 1190f6a067b in mainline. I also backported it for
2.6.39-stable and sent it to stable@...nel.org, but I haven't heard
anything back on it yet (I'll resend if I don't hear anything in the
next day or two).

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/