[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yun7h7pg8y7.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:46:40 -0700
From: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>, Robse <rob-se@...e.de>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bug #37472] Lenovo U160 (i915 black screen)
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:56:19 +0300, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
> There's no mention that the i915 developers know about this problem so
> I'm CC'ing Keith and Chris.
Thanks. I've added a comment to the bug:
First off, of course you are encouraged to re-test with 3.0-rc6 just to
make sure it hasn't changed in some way. I don't think anything has
changed enough to affect this, but it's always good to be sure.
I note a long sequence of patches that are supposed to help with the
U160:
448f53a1ede54eb854d036abf54573281412d650 drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC clocks
bcfbbce822d219eb587acaba8a6e062bbeae4761 Revert "drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC clocks"
a76150302d6e7ebc43e1a1ddaee7fd51db8da3b3 drm/i915: Add a module option to override the use of SSC
I'm not sure why a quirk wasn't added for this hardware; it's clearly
'non-standard' in some mystic way.
--
keith.packard@...el.com
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists