[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1107112217440.10944@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:18:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs, dlm: don't do pointless NULL check, use kzalloc
and fix order of arguments
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, David Teigland wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:54:31PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > In fs/dlm/lock.c in the dlm_scan_waiters() function there are 3 small
> > issues:
> >
> > 1) There's no need to test the return value of the allocation and do a
> > memset if is succeedes. Just use kzalloc() to obtain zeroed memory.
> >
> > 2) Since kfree() handles NULL pointers gracefully, the test of
> > 'warned' against NULL before the kfree() after the loop is completely
> > pointless. Remove it.
> >
> > 3) The arguments to kmalloc() (now kzalloc()) were swapped. Thanks to
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert for pointing this out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
>
> Thanks, I pushed this and a patch for the other swapped kmalloc to the
> next branch.
> Dave
>
Ok, thanks, then I won't bother updating my patch with that other kmalloc.
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists