linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Avoid Wunused-but-set warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110711224243.GB32033@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:42:45 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@...hang.net>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Nir Tzachar <nir.tzachar@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid Wunused-but-set warning

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:11:34AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:09:52 +0100 Mark Brown wrote:

> > Current practice seems to be that Acked-by is used instead of
> > Reviewed-by - the latter is comparatively rare.

> ISTM that more education and encouragement are needed about Reviewed-by:.
> (Patch Review is a possible kernel summit topic.)

> and that SubmittingPatches should be updated since we generally refer people
> to that file and not to Documentation/development-process/

I'm not sure I see any value in that - they're both pretty much
interchangible as far as I can tell.  The important thing is that people
are doing review, not the form filling part.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/