linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Avoid Wunused-but-set warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110711050951.GA22699@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:09:52 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@...hang.net>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Nir Tzachar <nir.tzachar@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid Wunused-but-set warning

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:53:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> But do as you like.  Which parts of SubmittingPatches do you think
> support your interpretation?

> and should we have this line:
> 	Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:.
> changed to:
> 	Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by: or Reviewed-by:.
> e.g.?

Current practice seems to be that Acked-by is used instead of
Reviewed-by - the latter is comparatively rare.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/