[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1C0F02.9040906@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:08:18 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
On 07/12/2011 11:38 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:20 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > Maybe we need a generic "run this function in this task's context"
> > mechanism instead. Like an IPI, but targeting tasks instead of cpus.
> >
>
> kernel/event/core.c:task_function_call() like?
Similar, but with stronger guarantees: when the function is called,
current == p, and the task was either sleeping or in userspace.
This can be used to reduce synchronization requirements between tasks.
For example, you can set a task-local bit flag with this, without
atomics. If this is rare enough, it's a net win compared to adding atomics.
aio completions might also make use of this.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists