| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1310462166-31469-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:16:00 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, yinghai@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range()
setup_bios_corruption_check() and memtest do_one_pass() open code
memblock free area iteration using memblock_x86_find_in_range_size().
Convert them to use for_each_free_mem_range() instead.
This leaves memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() and
memblock_x86_check_reserved_size() unused. Kill them.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h | 3 --
arch/x86/kernel/check.c | 34 +++++++++------------
arch/x86/mm/memblock.c | 62 ---------------------------------------
arch/x86/mm/memtest.c | 31 ++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 1460db2..d2a5a59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
#define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
-u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
-
void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
struct range;
@@ -15,6 +13,5 @@ int get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **rangep, int nodeid);
u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
u64 memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
-bool memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
index 95680fc..621cd23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ early_param("memory_corruption_check_size", set_corruption_check_size);
void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
{
- u64 addr = PAGE_SIZE; /* assume first page is reserved anyway */
+ phys_addr_t start, end;
+ u64 i;
if (memory_corruption_check == -1) {
memory_corruption_check =
@@ -82,28 +83,23 @@ void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
corruption_check_size = round_up(corruption_check_size, PAGE_SIZE);
- while (addr < corruption_check_size && num_scan_areas < MAX_SCAN_AREAS) {
- u64 size;
- addr = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(addr, &size, PAGE_SIZE);
+ for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
+ start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, round_up(start, PAGE_SIZE),
+ PAGE_SIZE, corruption_check_size);
+ end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, round_down(end, PAGE_SIZE),
+ PAGE_SIZE, corruption_check_size);
+ if (start >= end)
+ continue;
- if (!addr)
- break;
-
- if (addr >= corruption_check_size)
- break;
-
- if ((addr + size) > corruption_check_size)
- size = corruption_check_size - addr;
-
- memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + size, "SCAN RAM");
- scan_areas[num_scan_areas].addr = addr;
- scan_areas[num_scan_areas].size = size;
- num_scan_areas++;
+ memblock_x86_reserve_range(start, end, "SCAN RAM");
+ scan_areas[num_scan_areas].addr = start;
+ scan_areas[num_scan_areas].size = end - start;
/* Assume we've already mapped this early memory */
- memset(__va(addr), 0, size);
+ memset(__va(start), 0, end - start);
- addr += size;
+ if (++num_scan_areas >= MAX_SCAN_AREAS)
+ break;
}
if (num_scan_areas)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index 97fbc39..648d47d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -7,68 +7,6 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/range.h>
-/* Check for already reserved areas */
-bool __init memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
-{
- struct memblock_region *r;
- u64 addr = *addrp, last;
- u64 size = *sizep;
- bool changed = false;
-
-again:
- last = addr + size;
- for_each_memblock(reserved, r) {
- if (last > r->base && addr < r->base) {
- size = r->base - addr;
- changed = true;
- goto again;
- }
- if (last > (r->base + r->size) && addr < (r->base + r->size)) {
- addr = round_up(r->base + r->size, align);
- size = last - addr;
- changed = true;
- goto again;
- }
- if (last <= (r->base + r->size) && addr >= r->base) {
- *sizep = 0;
- return false;
- }
- }
- if (changed) {
- *addrp = addr;
- *sizep = size;
- }
- return changed;
-}
-
-/*
- * Find next free range after start, and size is returned in *sizep
- */
-u64 __init memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
-{
- struct memblock_region *r;
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, r) {
- u64 ei_start = r->base;
- u64 ei_last = ei_start + r->size;
- u64 addr;
-
- addr = round_up(ei_start, align);
- if (addr < start)
- addr = round_up(start, align);
- if (addr >= ei_last)
- continue;
- *sizep = ei_last - addr;
- while (memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(&addr, sizep, align))
- ;
-
- if (*sizep)
- return addr;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static __init struct range *find_range_array(int count)
{
u64 end, size, mem;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
index 92faf3a..46a5ff2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
@@ -70,24 +70,19 @@ static void __init memtest(u64 pattern, u64 start_phys, u64 size)
static void __init do_one_pass(u64 pattern, u64 start, u64 end)
{
- u64 size = 0;
-
- while (start < end) {
- start = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(start, &size, 1);
-
- /* done ? */
- if (start >= end)
- break;
- if (start + size > end)
- size = end - start;
-
- printk(KERN_INFO " %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx\n",
- (unsigned long long) start,
- (unsigned long long) start + size,
- (unsigned long long) cpu_to_be64(pattern));
- memtest(pattern, start, size);
-
- start += size;
+ u64 i;
+ phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
+
+ for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
+ this_start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_start, start, end);
+ this_end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_end, start, end);
+ if (this_start < this_end) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO " %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx\n",
+ (unsigned long long)this_start,
+ (unsigned long long)this_end,
+ (unsigned long long)cpu_to_be64(pattern));
+ memtest(pattern, this_start, this_end - this_start);
+ }
}
}
--
1.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists