lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:27:13 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: vmscan: Do use use PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim

Hi Mel,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> Zone reclaim is similar to direct reclaim in a number of respects.
> PF_SWAPWRITE is used by kswapd to avoid a write-congestion check
> but it's set also set for zone_reclaim which is inappropriate.
> Setting it potentially allows zone_reclaim users to cause large IO
> stalls which is worse than remote memory accesses.

As I read zone_reclaim_mode in vm.txt, I think it's intentional.
It has meaning of throttle the process which are writing large amounts
of data. The point is to prevent use of remote node's free memory.

And we has still the comment. If you're right, you should remove comment.
"         * and we also need to be able to write out pages for RECLAIM_WRITE
         * and RECLAIM_SWAP."


And at least, we should Cc Christoph and KOSAKI.

>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 4f49535..ebef213 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3063,7 +3063,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>         * and we also need to be able to write out pages for RECLAIM_WRITE
>         * and RECLAIM_SWAP.
>         */
> -       p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
> +       p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
>        lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
>        reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
>        p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> @@ -3116,7 +3116,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>        }
>
>        p->reclaim_state = NULL;
> -       current->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE);
> +       current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
>        lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
>        return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
>  }
> --
> 1.7.3.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ