[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110712094205.GB26125@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:42:06 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:36:05AM +0100, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 12:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > But it means that 'current' is not set to the right value. If the
> > > function depends on it, then it will misbehave. And in fact
> > > preempt_notifier_register(), which is the function we want to call here,
> > > does depend on current.
> > >
> > > Of course we need to find more users for this, but I have a feeling this
> > > will be generally useful. The alternative is to keep adding bits to
> > > thread_info::flags.
> >
> > Using TIF_bits sounds like a much better solution for this, wakeups are
> > really rather expensive and its best to avoid extra if at all possible.
> >
>
> We do need a way to make the task look at them.
... especially without pushing this down into the arch code where I don't
think it belongs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists