[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110712094822.GB29812@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:48:22 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:44:17PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 12:41 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > Using TIF_bits sounds like a much better solution for this, wakeups are
>> > really rather expensive and its best to avoid extra if at all possible.
>>
>> I would rather vote for Avi's solution too. Such a functionality is very
>> helpful for LWP-perf integration as well (because we need a way to call
>> do_mmap for a task != current).
>>
>
> It's not needed for that. See use_mm() (caller must be a kernel thread).
But in our case the caller would be the process that wants to count, not
a kernel thread.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists