[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1310462335.14978.12.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:18:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:16 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 12:14 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:08 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > Similar, but with stronger guarantees: when the function is called,
> > > current == p, and the task was either sleeping or in userspace.
> >
> > If the task is sleeping, current can never be p.
>
> The guarantee is that the task was sleeping just before the function is
> called. Of course it's woken up to run the function.
>
> The idea is that you run the function in a known safe point to avoid
> extra synchronization.
>
I'd much rather we didn't wake the task and let it sleep, that's usually
a very safe place for tasks to be. All you'd need is a guarantee it
won't be woken up while you're doing your thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists