[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1C2397.9040005@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:36:07 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
On 07/12/2011 01:24 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:07:25PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/12/2011 01:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> >> Ingo made perf-integration a merge-requirement for LWP. It is not really
> >> well-suited for being integrated into perf because the design goal was
> >> easy and efficient self-profiling of tasks (like you stated). So
> >> integrating it into perf causes some pain. But lets see how it works
> >> out.
> >
> > I don't think it's workable. Having do_mmap() called in the task's
> > context can change how it works.
>
> According to Ingo that is already done at other places in the kernel and
> should not be an issue.
kvm is one of those places, unfortunately.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists