[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110712104132.GA14189@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:41:32 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: Don't wait for completion in
writeback_inodes_sb_nr
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:34:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > All block device inodes sit on blockdev_superblock, we got rid of inodes
> > without a superblock long time ago.
> Sure, we can easily iterate also blockdev_superblock. What I meant is
> that blockdev_superblock will need a special handling since we otherwise
> ignore pseudo superblocks...
Pseudo superblocks aren't ignored. They are added to super_blocks like
all others, and iterate_supers doesn't skip over them. The problem
is that blockdev_superblock doesn't have a proper s_bdi set, and thus
gets skipped over by __sync_filesystem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists