lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1CB962.1000308@tlinx.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:15:14 -0700
From:	Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: device support VGA compat Matrox MGA G200ew

I was reviewing my kernel config and seeing what devices were
handled by what drivers -- and that all of them were configurable
via kernel devices.

I used an lspci -bkv to show me the kernel driver being used for each 
device.

One that would seem to be of some importance is the graphics controller.
There were some others devs that were 'unclaimed', but don't know
that they have a tangible effect and have yet to try a few
options, so won't bother with them here, but this one is a puzzler:

08:03.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G200eW 
WPCM450 (rev 0a) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
        Subsystem: Dell PowerEdge T610 MGA G200eW WPCM450
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 10
        Memory at d9800000 (32-bit, prefetchable)
        Memory at de7fc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
        Memory at de800000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
        Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1


I have tried the dev support under the 'frame buffer devs'
for Matrox accel, with ghe G100/G200/... options checked 'on'
(and Matrox I2C support as a module). But that modules doesn't
seem to be attached to this HW.

The only other Matrox G200 related option under the DRM support, but it
says it requires /dev/agpgart to be enabled.  I know the computer doesn't
have an AGP 'slot' (the card is built-in), but is is possible AGP
would still be the choice for the interface?

Other ideas or not-supported?

Thanks!
Linda

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ