linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: change return values in mac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E1D7FCA.1050203@broadcom.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:21:46 +0200
From:	"Arend van Spriel" <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	"adobriyan@...il.com" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: change return values in mac_pton() function

On 07/13/2011 01:12 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexey Dobriyan<adobriyan@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:09:03 +0300
>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Arend van Spriel<arend@...adcom.com>  wrote:
>>> The original commit adding this function noted a diverge from usual
>>> 0=success/-E=fail, but no motivation for it.
>> I thought it was obvious, but indeed wasn't explicitely
>> mentioned in changelog. But see inet_pton(3).
> Agreed it's better for mac_pton() to be consistent with existing,
> similar, interfaces like inet_pton.

I just liked the general approach of zero indicating success. But even 
in the realm called Linux not everything can be black and white, I guess :-D

Please drop the patch.

Gr. AvS

-- 
Almost nobody dances sober, unless they happen to be insane.
-- H.P. Lovecraft --


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/