| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1310520405-1558-1-git-send-email-Gregory.Dietsche@cuw.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:26:42 -0500 From: Greg Dietsche <Gregory.Dietsche@....edu> To: julia@...u.dk, Gilles.Muller@...6.fr, npalix.work@...il.com Cc: rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...u.dk, Greg Dietsche <Gregory.Dietsche@....edu> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] coccinelle: add parallel execution This patch series adds a new flag PARALLEL= to the coccicheck build target and documents the new feature. It works a lot like make's -j flag. I looked for a way to have make pass on the value of -j, but didn't find one - if anyone knows how to do that, I'd love to hear about it! I suppose an alternate approach would be to accomplish this via make itself, but the approach in this patch series seemed simpler to implement... Performance is quite a bit better than single threaded. On my 6 core box, the checks generally run around 3x faster. Feedback welcome!! :) Greg Greg Dietsche (3): coccinelle.txt: add overview section coccinelle.txt: add documentation of PARALLEL= flag coccicheck: add parallel execution Documentation/coccinelle.txt | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ scripts/coccicheck | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) -- 1.7.2.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists