[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1107130804430.4820@sister.anvils>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 13-07-11 03:57:40, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > I think we should assume that your -requeue_io +redirty_tail is a good
> > fix for the writeback freeze (if you can reassure us, that it does not
> > risk postponing some writes indefinitely)
> Well, I_FREEING or I_WILL_FREE inodes are written back by iput_final()
> and it is reclaim code that is responsible for eventually removing them. So
> writeback code can safely ignore them. I_NEW inodes should move out of this
> state when they are fully set up and in the writeback round following that,
> we will consider them for writeback. So I think the change really makes
> sense.
That fits. Good, thanks for the reassurance.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists