| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:31:30 +0100 From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, XFS <xfs@....sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim (again) On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:31:22PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > <SNIP> > The objective of the series - reducing writes from reclaim - is > met with filesystem writes from reclaim reduced to 0 with reclaim > in general doing less work. ext3, ext4 and xfs all showed marked > improvements for fs_mark in this configuration. btrfs looked worse > but it's within the noise and I'd expect the patches to have little > or no impact there due it ignoring ->writepage from reclaim. > My bad, I accidentally looked at an old report for btrfs based on older patches. In the report posted with all patches applied, the performance of btrfs does look better but as the patches should make no difference, it's still in the noise. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists