linux-kernel - Re: [patch 10/11] sh/unicore32/irqs: Do not trace arch_local_{*,irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1310521017.3931.19.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:36:57 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/11] sh/unicore32/irqs: Do not trace
 arch_local_{*,irq_*} functions

On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 12:34 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:50:30AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > Are you or Paul going to pull it into the sh tree?
> > 
> I don't mind pulling it in, but it's probably easier to simply have it
> lumped with the rest of the changes.

Hi Paul,

This "patch series" was just a email to all arch maintainers to the code
I modified. I'm not pulling this into any branch nor have I asked for
this series to go anywhere. This change is not dependent on any other
change nor is any other change dependent on this one. So I figured that
each maintainer could pull it in at their own free will.

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/