[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1DC535.1030000@genband.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:17:57 -0600
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: MK <mk@...nitivedissonance.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AVX "Sandy Bridge" hardware issue?
On 07/12/2011 06:49 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> MK<mk@...nitivedissonance.ca> writes:
>>
>> In which Andreas Schwab points out (rightly or wrongly) that according
>> to the /proc/cpuinfo from the slice, the processor actually does not
>> support AVX. However, the "model name", "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
>> E31230", is according to this a Sandy Bridge processor with AVX:
>
> If it's in a VM then the VM may not expose AVX to the guest
> (the VMs have to do that explicitely because AVX has additional state).
> If it's not in /proc/cpuinfo on the guest that's likely the case.
The OP mentioned that he's using OpenVZ, so it's running in a container
(chroot on steroids), not a "true" VM.
Each instance runs the same kernel, they're isolated from the other
instances using filesystem/process/network namespaces.
That said, /proc/cpuinfo is virtualized somehow by the containerization
since it shows only the cpus assigned to the container--it seems
plausible that they screwed up the cpu flags while doing it.
I think your suggestion of talking to the vendor is the correct next step.
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@...band.com
www.genband.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists