[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110713171011.GA11864@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:10:11 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Foong, Annie" <annie.foong@...el.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nadolski, Edmund" <edmund.nadolski@...el.com>,
"Skirvin, Jeffrey D" <jeffrey.d.skirvin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: rq_affinity doesn't seem to work?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:30:35PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> It's probably the grouping, we need to do something about that. Does the
> below patch make it behave as you expect?
"something", absolutely. But there is benefit from doing some aggregation
(we tried disabling it entirely with the "well-known OLTP benchmark" and
performance went down).
Ideally we'd do something like "if the softirq is taking up more than 10%
of a core, split the grouping". Do we have enough stats to do that kind
of monitoring?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists