linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] drivers/video/msm/mdp.c: adjust error handling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8ya4o2q2hqd.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:49:46 -0700
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drivers/video/msm/mdp.c: adjust error handling code

On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Paul Mundt wrote:

>> I wonder if the error handling code at the end of the function should be
>> calling clk_put as well?  In that case, having a separate label for this
>> case would be useful.  Otherwise, one of error_request_irq and error_get_clk
>> can be deleted
>> 
> The MSM implementation for it is simply a nop, so it's not going to
> really matter one way or the other. In terms of general consistency it
> might be worth implementing.

Today, at least.  Hopefully this will get better, since we can turn off
our clocks.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/