[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110713141849.b8cbf675.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:18:49 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q? "Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig" ?=
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
thierry.nolf.barco@...il.com, Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lothar Waßmann <LW@...o-electronics.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new helper to define common struct resource constructs
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:17 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Monday 11 July 2011, Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote:
> > resource definitions that just define start, end and flags = IORESOURCE_MEM
> > or IORESOURCE_IRQ (with start=end) are quite common. So introduce a shortcut
> > for them. Also make available a macro to specify named resources of both
> > types which are less common.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K____nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> What do others think, is this worthwhile?
> Should we also define macros for IORESOURCE_IO and IORESOURCE_DMA?
>
It would help if we could see some usage examples (ie: sample
conversions), to get a better idea of the value of this.
Also, DEFINE_RES_NAMED() is going to need a bunch of argument
parentheses to make it bulletproof.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists