linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm, sparc64: Implement gup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110713153348.b68b4196.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:33:48 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm, sparc64: Implement gup_fast()

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:42:11 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 14:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > With the recent mmu_gather changes that included generic RCU freeing of
> > page-tables, it is now quite straight forward to implement gup_fast() on
> > sparc64.
> > 
> > Andrew, please consider merging these patches.
> 
> Gah, quilt-mail ate all the From: headers again.. all 4 patches are in
> fact written by davem. Do you want a resend?

I have an editor ;)

I expect these would get more (ie: non-zero) testing if they were
merged via Dave's tree?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/