[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110713091130.GD2872@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:11:30 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and
remove x86 specific memblock code
Hello, Yinghai.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 0005-0013 adds generic memblock free area iterator and gradually
> > replaces x86 specific memblock mechanism with generic one.
>
> that is great, merge early_node_map into memblock array.
Yeah and with proper top down allocator and iterator, we should be
able to add back the early per-node allocaiton thing.
> looks it comes with some mismatch section warning...
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x120ba5): Section mismatch in reference from
> the function memblock_set_node() to the variable .init.data:memblock
> The function memblock_set_node() references
> the variable __initdata memblock.
> This is often because memblock_set_node lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong.
Oh, the __memblock_init thing. Can you please attach .config you
used?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists