[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110714081619.GB15844@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:16:19 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] pci: ARI is a PCIe v2 feature
* Jesse Barnes (jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:14:33 -0700
> Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
>
> > The function pci_enable_ari() may mistakenly set the downstream port
> > of a v1 PCIe switch in ARI Forwarding mode. This is a PCIe v2
> > feature, and with an SR-IOV device on that switch port believing the
> > switch above is ARI capable it may attempt to use functions 8-255,
> > translating into invalid (non-zero) device numbers for that bus.
> > This has been seen to cause Completion Timeouts and general
> > misbehaviour including hangs and panics.
>
> Thanks Chris, your earlier one is still sitting in my queue, but I
> wasn't going to send it for 3.0 as it didn't seem that critical. Do
> you think it is? If so you can send it directly to Linus with my ack
> as I don't have anything else queued, or just wait until the merge
> window when it will be put into the stable tree as well.
Cool, just wanted to make sure it wasn't lost. I think it's fine to
merge in next window and let it filter back to -stable. While I've seen
it cause panics, it's not a regression and the conditions required are
very specific (possibly including buggy BIOS).
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists