[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18169.1310605058@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:57:38 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz>,
Ian Kent <ikent@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <aviro@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Union mount and lockdep design issues
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> Normally overlayfs would be immune to this, since lower/upper are
> different filesystem types. But overlayfs-over-overlayfs would see the
> same lockdep warnings, right?
Yes.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists