[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1ED320.4080600@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:29:36 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: SVM: Use host_vmcb_pa for vmload and vmsave
On 07/13/2011 06:32 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> This saves copying over the vmload/vmsave switched part from
> the host to the guest vmcb later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 3d5990f..dc703ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -3704,9 +3704,13 @@ static void svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> /* Enter guest mode */
> "push %%"R"ax \n\t"
> - "mov %c[vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
> + "mov %c[host_vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
> __ex(SVM_VMLOAD) "\n\t"
> + "mov (%%"R"sp), %%"R"ax\n\t"
> + "mov %c[vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
> __ex(SVM_VMRUN) "\n\t"
> + "mov (%%"R"sp), %%"R"ax\n\t"
> + "mov %c[host_vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
> __ex(SVM_VMSAVE) "\n\t"
> "pop %%"R"ax \n\t"
>
Okay, so the plan is to split L2 state between ->vmcb and ->host_vmcb?
In that case my suggestion for patch 1 doesn't apply. But the name
still is confusing. If we don't find a better one, I want a fat comment
explaining how state is split.
(would be good to have documentation for the overall strategy of nsvm,
like we have for nvmx and nmmu).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists