[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110714132317.GC2832@dhcp-26-164.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:23:17 +0200
From: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com,
hughd@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: remove page_table_lock for mm counters in
acct_arg_size()
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:18:22PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/14, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >
> > Commit 172703b mm: delete non-atomic mm counter implementation
> > removed non-atomic mm counters implementation. I think there is no need to hold
> > page_table_lock for add_mm_counter() when the splitted page table locks are not
> > used. This patch removes the locking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/exec.c | 6 ------
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> > index 6075a1e..e6fc5e1 100644
> > --- a/fs/exec.c
> > +++ b/fs/exec.c
> > @@ -182,13 +182,7 @@ static void acct_arg_size(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pages)
> >
> > bprm->vma_pages = pages;
> >
> > -#ifdef SPLIT_RSS_COUNTING
> > add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, diff);
> > -#else
> > - spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> > - add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, diff);
> > - spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> > -#endif
>
> Heh. Thanks Frantisek, you are right. But this patch is already in mm-tree,
> fs-execc-acct_arg_size-ptl-is-no-longer-needed-for-add_mm_counter.patch
>
> Oleg.
>
:) thanks. Sorry I should check that first.
--
Frantisek Hrbata
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists