linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110714150700.GC23587@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:07:00 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, XFS <xfs@....sgi.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in
 direct reclaim

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:46:34PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > XFS and btrfs already disable writeback from memcg context, as does ext4
> > for the typical non-overwrite workloads, and none has fallen apart.
> > 
> > In fact there's no way we can enable them as the memcg calling contexts
> > tend to have massive stack usage.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, XFS/btrfs adds pages to radix-tree in deep stack ?

We're using a fairly deep stack in normal buffered read/write,
wich is almost 100% common code.  It's not just the long callchain
(see below), but also that we put the unneeded kiocb and a vector
of I/O vects on the stack:

vfs_writev
do_readv_writev
do_sync_write
generic_file_aio_write
__generic_file_aio_write
generic_file_buffered_write
generic_perform_write
block_write_begin
grab_cache_page_write_begin
add_to_page_cache_lru
add_to_page_cache
add_to_page_cache_locked
mem_cgroup_cache_charge

this might additionally come from in-kernel callers like nfsd,
which has even more stack space used.  And at this point we only
enter the memcg/reclaim code, which last time I had a stack trace
ate up another about 3k of stack space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/