[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1310661699.2309.13.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:41:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 17:49 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [ 4172.371094] =======================================================
> [ 4172.371097] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [ 4172.371103] 3.0.0-rc7-dbg-00565-g6b31efc #644
> [ 4172.371105] -------------------------------------------------------
> [ 4172.371108] make/11702 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 4172.371111] (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810a55e2>] __rcu_read_unlock+0xb9/0x217
> [ 4172.371123]
> [ 4172.371123] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 4172.371125] (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103775e>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x28b
> [ 4172.371135]
> [ 4172.371135] which lock already depends on the new lock.
Happen to have a .config and means of reproduction? We're a little
stumped at trying to explain how this can actually happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists