[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110714193827.GA11552@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:38:28 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:34:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Thank you -- you were indeed running with CONFIG_PREEMPT and
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST, which would be the case for the bug that Steven Rostedt
> found. On reproducing, yes, it could be a bit tough, as the race window
> is rather narrow. I could probably add delays to force the situation htat
> Steven found, but it would be hard to prove that this is your situation.
>
> Dave, was your lockdep splat also with CONFIG_PREEMPT and
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST?
yeah. which might explain why I haven't seen it since. (I usually have it
disabled, but turn it on occasionally for a 'lets see what breaks' test)
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists