linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i915: slab shrinker have to return -1 if it cant shrink any objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:48:08 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	david@...morbit.com
CC:	chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, keithp@...thp.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, airlied@...ux.ie,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: slab shrinker have to return -1 if it cant shrink
 any objects

>> If you are thinking the shrinker protocol is too complicated, doc update
>> patch is really welcome.
> 
> Slab shrinkers have a nasty, crappy interface and the shrink_slab()
> code is full of bugs.  Rather that telling people to "update the
> documentation" because it's too complex, how about we fix the
> interface and the bugs?

If you can take your time for that, I don't hesitate to help you. ;)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/