lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110714234030.30d6b455@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:40:30 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Eric Andersson <eric.andersson@...xphere.com>
Cc:	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhengguang.guo@...ch-sensortec.com,
	stefan.nilsson@...xphere.com,
	Albert Zhang <xu.zhang@...ch-sensortec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] input: add driver for Bosch Sensortec's BMA150
 accelerometer

> +		values represent the range given as +/- G.
> +		Possible values are: 2, 4, 8.
> +
> +		Reading: returns the current acceleration range.
> +
> +		Writing: sets a new acceleration range.

Same comment as last time - these values are not discoverable so it
should set the nearest bigger range.

> +
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/i2c/devices/<busnum>-<devaddr>/bandwidth
> +Date:		May 2011
> +Contact:	Eric Andersson <eric.andersson@...xphere.com>
> +Description:	This is used to setup the digital filtering on ADC output data.
> +		The values represent the bandwidth given in Hz.
> +		Possible values are: 25, 50, 100, 190, 375, 750, 1500
> +
> +		Reading: returns the current bandwidth.
> +
> +		Writing: sets a new bandwidth.

Ditto


> +	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bw_val); i++)
> +		ret += sprintf(buf + ret,
> +			(bw_val[i].reg == bw) ? "[%d] " : "%d ",
> +			bw_val[i].value);

sysfs nodes should really be single values

> +static const struct i2c_device_id bma150_id[] = {
> +	{ "bma150", 0 },
> +	{ "smb380", 0 },

bma023 ?

It also doesn't expose the thresholds or support interrupts which the
one I posted did.

So while its better it still seems incomplete - its certainly nowhere
near where it can replace the one I posted months ago and doesn't seem to
be making any headway.

Dmitry shall I repost the intel one - at this point I think it would be a
better starting point as it supports more features, interrupts and the
like although it's not perfect either.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ