[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGTjWtDHH_VXXAsh5WPspTwPEhzcKi4_Jno7w=jReiS7HSALQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:48:23 -0700
From: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow disabling of sys_iopl, sys_ioperm
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:34:53 -0700
> Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> In some build environments, it is useful to allow disabling of IO
>> accesses to hardware, without having to rely on CAP_SYS_RAWIO (which is
>
> And others include mmap and the tty driver and the PCI config space
> (various devices can be manipulated via pci config space to do I/O cycles)
>
> It strikes me that
>
> a) you can do this with a security module
I can? How? The whole LSM approach seems intractable to me.
> b) its rather incomplete
>
> and as such you don't need kernel hacks to do it because everything you
> want is already there.
Where? In an out of tree security module patchset?
>
> Alan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists