linux-kernel - [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE in memblock_alloc_try

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-15fb09722df32b7685be1cbcac198bb556ddaffe@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:38:34 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, yinghai@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE in memblock_alloc_try_nid()

Commit-ID:  15fb09722df32b7685be1cbcac198bb556ddaffe
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/15fb09722df32b7685be1cbcac198bb556ddaffe
Author:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:58:07 +0200
Committer:  H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:35:58 -0700

memblock: Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE in memblock_alloc_try_nid()

After node affine allocation fails, memblock_alloc_try_nid() calls
memblock_alloc_base() with @max_addr set to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE.
This is inconsistent with memblock_alloc() and what the function's
sole user - sparc/mm/init_64 - expects, although it doesn't make any
difference as sparc64 doesn't have highmem and ACCESSIBLE equals
ANYWHERE.

This patch makes memblock_alloc_try_nid() use ACCESSIBLE instead of
ANYWHERE.  This isn't complete as node affine allocation doesn't
consider memblock.current_limit.  It will be handled with future
changes.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior difference.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a0562d1..87e512d 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, i
 
 	if (res)
 		return res;
-	return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE);
+	return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
 }
 
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/