[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110715145132.GA4296@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:51:32 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:13:27AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, but what happens if all 2000+ different companies start adding their
> > fields to the signed-off-by: area of the kernel for their internal
> > tracking systems?
>
> That's been happening for a long time; there have been kernel patches
> referencing LTC, RHEL, and SLES bugzilla entries; many of those
> bug entries are not public so as not to reveal customer confidential
> information. I've never seen anyone complain about that before.
But none of them are on the Signed-off-by: line area, right?
Also, putting it in the text of the changelog, with a url, is fine. And
it had better be a public url, otherwise it makes no sense at all. I've
seen many public SUSE and Ubuntu urls in changelog entries, any
non-public ones should not be in there at all.
Just like with gerrit ids in signed-off-by areas, references to internal
bugzilla entries, in the signed-off-by area, should not be there at all.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists