linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110715152738.GA2276@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:27:38 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Any objection to the swap-over-NBD stuff going ahead to get part of the
> complexity out of the way?

Sure, that's what I was advocating for.  The filesystem interfaces in
the current swap over nbd patches on the other hand are complete crap
and need to be redone, but we've already discussed that a lot of times.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/