linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:55:19 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 04:51:32PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> But none of them are on the Signed-off-by: line area, right?

Is it really the case that your concern is that there be a whitespace
between the bug tracker reference and the signed-off-by area?   So

     Company-bug-id: ....

     Signed-off-by: ....

is preferable to

     Company-bug-id:
     Signed-off-by: ...

If that's your only concern, ok, whatever.  I don't personally care a
whole lot either way.

It's not like there was ever any kind of formal standards committee
that decided that adding "Acked-by" and "Tested-by" and "CC" were ok
in the signed-off-by block, and other things weren't, after all.

       		     	    	      	     	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/