[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110715220447.GJ2327@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:04:47 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 05:48:06PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Friday 15 July 2011 12:56:13 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > OK. Ed, would you be willing to try the patch out?
>
> I am booted at the same git commit with a bluetooth and the disable local_bh around softirq()
> patch from this thread. So far so good. Not sure how 'easy' this one is to trigger a second time -
> I've been running with threadirq enabled since .39 came out. Last night was the first deadlock...
> If nothing happened post rc6 to make it more likely it could be a while before it triggers again.
Thank you for trying it out, Ed! And I know that you will not be shy
should the problem recur. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists