[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF+7xWnOZkOpMSiOBJKA2HMpstzqUt1GT3Gr+g783trYH+kj3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:44:53 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Fix memory leak in set_machine_constraints()
error paths
2011/7/15 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:29:19PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>> const struct regulation_constraints *constraints)
>> {
>> - int ret = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> struct regulator_ops *ops = rdev->desc->ops;
>>
>
> This doesn't look like a leak fix? There's nothing that checks for
> other errors here (like null pointers)?
>
I think it does checking null pointer for rdev->constraints in current
implementation:
static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
const struct regulation_constraints *constraints)
{
int ret;
struct regulator_ops *ops = rdev->desc->ops;
rdev->constraints = kmemdup(constraints, sizeof(*constraints),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rdev->constraints)
return -ENOMEM;
Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists