[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107172344.35422.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:44:35 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
On Saturday 16 July 2011 07:07:41 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in lots of
> files due to commit 7712eeac230b ("arm-soc: remove rmk/for-next merge")
> from the arm-soc tree (and maybe some others).
>
> Arnd, is there some way that you can rebuild (rebase) your tree without
> the merge of Russell's tree and the consequent revert of that merge? It
> is likely to revert a whole swath of changes from Russell's tree :-(
>
> I have dropped the arm-soc tree for today.
I've done a new branch 'for-next' now to replace the 'master' branch, and
it does not contain the broken merge any more. Please change your list
of branches accordingly.
There are three other conflicts that I found when test-merging the arm-soc
tree with the current linux-next tree. I've already written about the
omap_dss2 mismerge, which is a huge mess and I've resolved that conflict
on my end for now. There is a simpler conflict with the gpio tree, which
I've also resolved in a similar way by adding a dependency here.
The third conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27_3ds.c is much simpler, so
I assume you will do the obvious hand-merge.
Thanks,
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists