linux-kernel - Re: Should SUBLEVEL be removed for 3.x ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:10:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: Should SUBLEVEL be removed for 3.x ?

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> >
> > Would be nice to get this clarified before 3.0 happens :-)
> 
> I don't think I can realistically make it call itself 3.0, even though
> the *tag* will certainly be just 3.0.
> 
> I considered making it a config option (so that people with fixed
> tools could do it), but ..
> 
Ok, so SUBLEVEL will stay. I guess that the stable kernels will then just 
use that and EXTRAVERSION will go away - right?


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/