[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E239400.30308@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:01:36 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: linux@....linux.org.uk
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, workgroup.linux@....com,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, tglx@...utronix.de,
weizeng.he@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization
Russell,
On 07/06/2011 04:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 July 2011 23:02:37 Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>
>>> This adds probing for ARM L2x0 cache controllers via device tree. Support
>>> includes the L210, L220, and PL310 controllers. The binding allows setting
>>> up cache RAM latencies and filter addresses (PL310 only).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>>
>> By rights, this should go via the arm tree, but it depends on patches
>> that are already in devicetree/next. Arnd, how do you want to handle
>> this? I want to avoid rebasing devicetree/next.
>
> It's outside of the scope of the arm-soc tree really, the l2x0 code
> is clearly core arm stuff, so it belongs into Russell's tree.
>
> I think it's best if Russell can provide an Ack for this and you
> put it in the tree that already has the dependencies.
>
Do you have any objection to this patch or Grant taking it in his tree?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists