linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] splice: i_mutex vs splice write deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1310961884-11634-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:04:42 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] splice: i_mutex vs splice write deadlock

generic_file_splice_write() takes the inode->i_mutex after the
filesystem has taken whatever locks it needs to ensure sanity.
however, this typically violates the locking order of filesystems
with their own locks in that the order is usually i_mutex ->
filesystem lock.

XFS is such a case, and generic_file_splice_write() is generating
lockdep warnings because of lock inversions between the
inode->i_mutex and the XFS_I(inode)->i_iolock. There is also a
reported case of fio causing a deadlock when it mixes IO types
(e.g. splice vs direct IO).

This patch set introduces generic_file_splice_write_unlocked() and
factors the code such that __generic_file_splice_write() will only
lock the i_mutex if called from the locked variant. The second patch
modifies XFS to use the new function.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/