[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1107181708590.1663-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:12:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
cc: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb_storage: make usb-stor-scan task non-freezable
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Seth Forshee wrote:
> The following patch is in response to a consistently reproducible
> failure to freeze tasks prior to restoring a hibernation image on a
> Toshiba NB505 netbook. This machine has a built-in USB card reader.
> Since the usb-stor-scan task is freezable but the code in
> quiesce_and_remove_host() that waits for scanning to complete is not,
> khubd can fail to freeze when processing the disconnect for the card
> reader.
What card-reader disconnect?
> It seems that both should either be freezable or not freezable. Since
> there doesn't currently seem to be any freezable way to wait on a
> completion, I started with the simpler approach of making usb-stor-scan
> non-freezable. If it would be preferable to make both freezable I can
> take that approach instead.
I'm not sure what the best approach is. usb-stor-scan has to be
freezable, because the scanning code registers new child device
structures, which isn't allowed during suspend or hibernation.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists