lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110718173409.2885649b65937eb7caecf943@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:34:09 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the writeback tree with the vfs tree

Hi Wu,

Today's linux-next merge of the writeback tree got a conflict in
fs/fs-writeback.c between commit dffe5a6c5214 ("superblock: move
pin_sb_for_writeback() to fs/super.c") from the vfs tree and commits
f758eeabeb96 ("writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into
bdi_writeback.list_lock") and d46db3d58233 ("writeback: make
writeback_control.nr_to_write straight") from the writeback tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/fs-writeback.c
index b8c507c,6d49439..0000000
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@@ -460,6 -480,63 +480,37 @@@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *in
  	return ret;
  }
  
 -/*
 - * For background writeback the caller does not have the sb pinned
 - * before calling writeback. So make sure that we do pin it, so it doesn't
 - * go away while we are writing inodes from it.
 - */
 -static bool pin_sb_for_writeback(struct super_block *sb)
 -{
 -	spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 -	if (list_empty(&sb->s_instances)) {
 -		spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 -		return false;
 -	}
 -
 -	sb->s_count++;
 -	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 -
 -	if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
 -		if (sb->s_root)
 -			return true;
 -		up_read(&sb->s_umount);
 -	}
 -
 -	put_super(sb);
 -	return false;
 -}
 -
+ static long writeback_chunk_size(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+ 				 struct wb_writeback_work *work)
+ {
+ 	long pages;
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * WB_SYNC_ALL mode does livelock avoidance by syncing dirty
+ 	 * inodes/pages in one big loop. Setting wbc.nr_to_write=LONG_MAX
+ 	 * here avoids calling into writeback_inodes_wb() more than once.
+ 	 *
+ 	 * The intended call sequence for WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is:
+ 	 *
+ 	 *      wb_writeback()
+ 	 *          writeback_sb_inodes()       <== called only once
+ 	 *              write_cache_pages()     <== called once for each inode
+ 	 *                   (quickly) tag currently dirty pages
+ 	 *                   (maybe slowly) sync all tagged pages
+ 	 */
+ 	if (work->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || work->tagged_writepages)
+ 		pages = LONG_MAX;
+ 	else {
+ 		pages = min(bdi->avg_write_bandwidth / 2,
+ 			    global_dirty_limit / DIRTY_SCOPE);
+ 		pages = min(pages, work->nr_pages);
+ 		pages = round_down(pages + MIN_WRITEBACK_PAGES,
+ 				   MIN_WRITEBACK_PAGES);
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	return pages;
+ }
+ 
  /*
   * Write a portion of b_io inodes which belong to @sb.
   *
@@@ -559,40 -643,41 +617,41 @@@ static long __writeback_inodes_wb(struc
  		struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
  		struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
  
 -		if (!pin_sb_for_writeback(sb)) {
 +		if (!grab_super_passive(sb)) {
- 			requeue_io(inode);
+ 			requeue_io(inode, wb);
  			continue;
  		}
- 		ret = writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc, false);
+ 		wrote += writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, work);
  		drop_super(sb);
  
- 		if (ret)
- 			break;
+ 		/* refer to the same tests at the end of writeback_sb_inodes */
+ 		if (wrote) {
+ 			if (time_is_before_jiffies(start_time + HZ / 10UL))
+ 				break;
+ 			if (work->nr_pages <= 0)
+ 				break;
+ 		}
  	}
- 	spin_unlock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
  	/* Leave any unwritten inodes on b_io */
+ 	return wrote;
  }
  
- static void __writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb,
- 		struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
+ long writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages)
  {
- 	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
+ 	struct wb_writeback_work work = {
+ 		.nr_pages	= nr_pages,
+ 		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
+ 		.range_cyclic	= 1,
+ 	};
  
- 	spin_lock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
- 	if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&wb->b_io))
- 		queue_io(wb, wbc->older_than_this);
- 	writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc, true);
- 	spin_unlock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
- }
+ 	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+ 	if (list_empty(&wb->b_io))
+ 		queue_io(wb, NULL);
+ 	__writeback_inodes_wb(wb, &work);
+ 	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
  
- /*
-  * The maximum number of pages to writeout in a single bdi flush/kupdate
-  * operation.  We do this so we don't hold I_SYNC against an inode for
-  * enormous amounts of time, which would block a userspace task which has
-  * been forced to throttle against that inode.  Also, the code reevaluates
-  * the dirty each time it has written this many pages.
-  */
- #define MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES     1024
+ 	return nr_pages - work.nr_pages;
+ }
  
  static inline bool over_bground_thresh(void)
  {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ